|
Home
Subscribe
About The Journal
Current Issue
Editor's
Comments
Upcoming
Events
Ongoing
Activities
World
Developments
Dialoguing
What
We Are About
Articles
Media
Notes
Reports/Announcements
Funding
Past Issues
Editorial Team
Questions/Feedback
Selected Links
|
Vol. XVIII, No. 2, Winter, 2004
WORD
DEVELOPMENTS
There is still much uncertainty about the future, as the New Year opens
with a mix of positive and negative events and trends around the world.
Having been given new opportunities and a new area of operation by the
U.S. invasion of Iraq, al Qaeda and other groups and individuals
appearing to share its approach are quite active and have launched
numerous bombings and other attacks from Turkey, though Sudi
Arabia to Indonesia.
Indeed, The November bombings of two synagogues in Istanbul indicate that the al Qaeda network is now relying on
sympathizers and allied local organizations in different parts of the
world to strike at targets of opportunity that accord with the
movement's broad aims, often without any direct guidance from a central
command structure.
On December 8, Guardian diplomatic
editor Ewen MacAskill noted that the fundamental objective of
al-Qaeda's 9/11 attacks was to polarize the world between the U.S. and
the jihadis. While the U.S. and its allies have been quite successful
in wiping out some of al Qaeda's organizational network, and have
removed major training bases from Afghanistan,
they are losing badly in the wider political battle for Muslim hearts
and minds. While only a tiny minority in the Muslim world actively
identify with al Qaeda's actions, support for it has grown
substantially, and more significant, a majority of Muslims find little
to quarrel with in Bin Laden's characterization of the United States as
a force innately hostile to Arab and Muslim interests, and the war in
Iraq has proved to be a major aid to the jihadi cause worldwide. (The
New York Times reports that the Iraq "jihad" appears to have captured
the imagination of thousands of young Muslims around the world, many of
whom have had no previous connection with Al-Qaeda or other jihadi
networks. Hundreds of whom have been making their way from Europe
to Iraq, to fight the U.S. Though according to Syed Saleem Shahzad in
the Asia Times, most of the would-be 'foreign fighters' are captured en
route, and the actual number of foreign jihadis in Iraq may be no
higher than 250.)
MacAskill argues that the only way the U.S. can
begin to reverse this situation is to move forcefully to achieve a just
solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Meanwhile, many Muslim
liberals are saying that the Nobel Committee's decision to award this
year's peace prize to Iranian human rights activist Shirin Ebadi was a blistering
rebuke to that country's authoritarian clerical leadership. In her
acceptance speech, Ebadi challenged them to recognize the democratic
and humanitarian values of Islam, and reform their society accordingly.
However she also a sternly rebuked the United States for invading and
occupying Iraq, for failing to enforce UN resolutions when those
require action by Israel and for its poor example to others when it
comes to suppressing rights in the name of security. She insisted that
military intervention hurt rather than helped those who were fighting
for democracy in the Middle East.
In mid-January, Dr. Jeffrey Record,
visiting professor at the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Studies
Institute (on leave from teaching strategy and tactics at the U.S. Air
Force's Air War College) stated in the summary of a recently published
article that President Bush's "Global War on Terror" (GWOT) has gotten
off course. "In the wake of the September 11, 2001, al-Qaeda terrorist
attacks on the United States, the U.S. Government declared a
global war on terrorism (GWOT). The nature and parameters of that war,
however, remain frustratingly unclear. The administration has
postulated a multiplicity of enemies, including rogue states; weapons
of mass destruction (WMD) proliferators; terrorist organizations of
global, regional, and national scope; and terrorism itself. It also
seems to have conflated them into a monolithic threat, and in so doing
has subordinated strategic clarity to the moral clarity it
strives for in foreign policy and may have set the United States on a
course of open-ended and gratuitous conflict with states and nonstate
entities that pose no serious threat to the United States. Of
particular concern has been the conflation of al-Qaeda and Saddam
Husseinís Iraq as a single, undifferentiated terrorist threat.
This was a strategic error of the first order because it ignored
critical differences between the two in character, threat level, and
susceptibility to U.S. deterrence and military action. The result has
been an unnecessary preventive war of choice against a deterred Iraq
that has created a new front in the Middle East for Islamic terrorism
and diverted attention and resources away from securing the American
homeland against further assault by an undeterable al-Qaeda. The war
against Iraq was not integral to the Global War on Terrorism, but
rather a detour from it. Additionally, most of the GWOTís
declared objectives, which include the destruction of al-Qaeda and
other transnational terrorist organizations, the transformation of Iraq
into a prosperous, stable democracy, the democratization of the rest of
the autocratic Middle East, the eradication of terrorism as a means of
irregular warfare, and the (forcible, if necessary) termination of WMD
proliferation to real and potential enemies worldwide, are unrealistic
and condemn the United States to a hopeless quest for absolute
security. As such, the GWOTís goals are also politically,
fiscally, and militarily unsustainable. Accordingly, the GWOT must be
recalibrated to conform to concrete U.S. security interests and the
limits of American power." (The full report, "Bounding the Global War
on Terrorism, " is posted on the web site of Strategic Studies
Institute:
http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/pubs/2003/bounding/bounding.htm).
In Iraq, the number of insurgent attacks has dropped to half the number
occurring several months ago, before the capture of Saddam Hussein, which may well have
contributed to the decline, encouraging more Iraqis to become involved
with the provisional government, army and police, or to provide
intelligence information. U.S. commanders say, however, that the
attacks, which take their highest toll on Iraqis, continue to become
more sophisticated. During the last four months of 2003, the U.S.
casualty rate doubled, and has not diminished with the capture of the
former Iraqi President. By
the end of the year, at least 475 American service people had died in
Iraq, with 325 killed in action and 2,033 wounded. By the end of last
year at least three times as many U.S. soldiers had been wounded in
action during the counter insurgency phase than were wounded in the
initial combat phase. Seymour Hersh, wrirting in the December 15 issue
of The New Yorker, reports
that Donald Rumsfeld's latest strategy for Iraq calls for a new special
ops unit, Task Force 121, to track down, capture or terminate hardcore
members of the Iraqi resistance. Israeli intelligence officers have
been brought in to help Americans plan their operations. Rumsfeld
refers to the strategy as "Manhunts."
Hersh quotes one U.S. advisor as saying, "The only way we can win is to
go unconventional. We're going to have to play their game. Guerrilla
versus guerrilla. Terrorism versus terrorism. We've got to scare the
Iraqis into submission." Hersh reports another source as saying,: "We
did the American things and we've been the nice guy. Now we're going to
be the bad guy, and being the bad guy works."
A recent TV documentary of one Fourth Infantry division unit (Martin
Adler, Independent News-rebroadcast by Jim Lehrer's News Hour, PBS,
January 2) indicates that at least some army units are taking a tough
approach. Some experts believe, however, that the get-tough approach,
broadly applied, tends to create more resistance than it eliminates.
Marine Lieutenant Colonel Carl E. Mundy was reported in the New York Times as arguing that
rather than treating the population as enemies, U.S. commanders need to
incorporate Iraq's population into their strategy, then use discretion
in eliminating the pockets of resistance. This is essentially the community policing model of peace
keeping reported in these pages on several occasions as having been a
particularly effective strategy, particularly in the few instances it
was used in Somalia, where it was much more effective than the standard
or get tough approaches that were generally used there.
By contrast, the Israeli get tough approach, now being employed in
Iraq, which aims at punishing the population for supporting armed
resistance, while eliminating more insurgents, at least initially, also
creates more guerilla fighters, while creating more support for them,
and reducing more than increasing popular willingness to inform or
collaborate against them, because it angers the local population, as
can be seen by looking at the effect of just this strategy by the
Israelis in the Occupied Territories. To date, White House efforts,
which many see as being poor diplomacy, to obtain additional troops
from other countries to assist policing the reconstruction have
produced only small results.
The Bush administration is
hoping a new Iraqi constitution can
be drafted and an Iraqi government put in place by July, but progress
by the Iraqi Governing Council has been slow. Morover, Iraq's
influential leading Shiite Cleric, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Husseini,
demands that Iraq's parliament be elected, rather than chosen by
regional caucuses, which is the current U.S. plan (though he did say he
would accept a regional caucuses if a UN investigation found that
elections were impractical by early summer, as the U.S. claims). In
mid-January, thousands of Shiites demonstrated in Basra and Baghdad,
demanding elections. Following the beginning of those demonstrations,
the Bush Administration asked UN
Secretary General Kofi Annan for assistance setting up the
Parliament, investigating whether elections were practicable by June.
In November, an assessment by the International
Crisis Group, of what were then the latest U.S. proposals found
them to be inadequate. While the IGC supports
the principle of decoupling the constitution-making process from the
transfer of sovereignty, it warned that for the political process to
build the necessary legitimacy it would have to unfold under the
supervision of the UN rather than the CPA.
On the economic front, several European
countries have stated a willingness to cancel some of Iraq's
$225 billion, while several billion in reconstruction aid has been
promised, however, the debt is so huge, and the amount of pledged aid
is considerably less than what is needed, that reconstruction is likely
to develop very slowly. The $13 billion in donor pledges to help Iraq's
reconstruction, which added to Washington's contribution would make $33
billion, remains short of the $55 billion need according to the World Bank and IMF estimates.
Meanwhile, limited but significant gains, such as restoring electric
power and other services, are being made incrementally. The small and
slow economic progress is a major difficulty for gaining stability. On
January 11, in the southern city of Amarah
hundreds of angry unemployed Shiites, protesting the lack
of jobs, pelted British troops guarding city halls with stones. On
January 14, on the third day of protests demanding jobs, demonstrating
Shiites rioted in the Southern city of Kut.
In November. President Bush announced a major shift in U.S. foreign
policy, stating that the pursuit of democracy in the Arab world was now
a major policy priority, on the level of the Cold War efforts of his
predecessors. The leaders of autocratic Arab regimes were largely
silent about the pronouncement, while more liberal Arab commentators
ranged from doubtful to derisive in response. Many said that the words
were good, but they did not trust the speaker to mean them, seeing them
either as mere propaganda, or as a cover for largely unilateral U.S.
measures, which even should they be intended to be democratizing, would
be antidemocratic, in fact, unless the people of the nations involved
were respected as the primary voice in directing and shaping the
process.
In October, Israeli prime minister
Ariel Sharon sent shock waves through the Middle East in
launching his country's first air strike on Syria in twenty years, destroying
what the Israeli government claimed was a terrorist training camp near Damascus, in response to a suicide
bombing that killed 19 people in Haifa.
The attack was carried out by a member of Islamic Jihad, which
maintains offices in Damascus, but the attacker, like almost all who
blow themselves up in Israel, was from the West Bank and had never left the
Israeli-occupied territory. Initially, the Israeli action created harsh
words from Syria, and something of a crises among Arab nations. The
situation has changed significantly since October, however, with Israel
and Syria beginning secret negotiations shortly after, if not before,
the air strike, in an attempt to reopen peace negotiations broken off
in 2000.
In December, Syrian President Bashar
Assad publicly called for a resumption of the talks, causing
debate among members of the Israeli government as to how to respond. In
early January, Prime Minister Sharon stated that Israel would restart
negotiations once Syria stopped aiding and harboring groups that carry
out terrorism in Israel. Just that after that, Israel's President
invited Assad to visit Jerusalem. The Syrian government replied that
the invitation was not a serious peace effort. Meanwhile, once they
became public, the secret negotiations stopped, so that whether there
will continue to be an opening for real negotiations in the near future
is unknown.
Much
has occurred relating to the Palestinian-Israeli
situation since September, but prospects for movement toward
peace are only slightly improved, though there are some potential that
likely cannot be realized under the current government of Ariel Sharon.
Sharon appears to be continuing, without any exit strategy (except
threatening to unilaterally declare Palestine an independent state with
borders and other settlement arrangements of his choosing), his policy
of being tough with the Palestinians, finding excuses not to negotiate
seriously (such as saying that negotiations are impossible as long as
Arafat has a major role in the Palestinian authority, or repeatedly
requiring an impossible length of time with no Palestinian violence
against Israelis before opening a dialogue), making symbolic gestures,
with little, if any meaningful substance, in pretence of attempting to
attain peace, and ordering attacks against the leaders of Palestinian
groups, causing numerous civilian casualties that must provoke a
violent response, whenever the more extreme Palestinians might agree to
a ceasefire.
Sharon has made some occasional minor concessions to President Bush's
Road Map for Peace, such as occasionally, including recently, shutting
down some illegal settlement expansions, or outposts. Since Bush has
not put much energy into the realization of the plan, Sharon has been
able to claim to be going along with it (though he openly objects to
aspects of it), while not really doing so. The U.S. has used little
meaningful leverage to shift Israel's policy (tough it did limit some
loan guarantees in opposition to the building of the wall), limiting
itself to cautioning Sharon that some actions are unwise, such as the
assassinations of Palestinian militant leaders and bombing an alleged
terrorist camp in Syria. Sharon's position is currently weakening,
however.
The current army commander, along with four past Israeli security
chiefs and other Israeli military analysts and commentators now openly
admit that their country's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza has had a corrosive effect on
their military and society, and that its program of collective
punishments on the local population causes the Palestinians to support
violence and suicide bombings by Hamas, the Al-Aksa brigades and
others, creating a deepening cycle of repression and resistance. The
change in the thinking of some key security leaders and several other
developments is beginning to shift Israeli public opinion away from
supporting Sharon's policies, though the shift is not yet large. One
development is the still not large, but growing, number of security
personnel refusing to serve in the occupied territories or stating
opposition to some security operations there.
Another is the fact that Sharon's policies do not seem to be changing
the basic situation, though the number of suicide bombings is down from
some months ago, and there were a few weeks with no bombings. Very
important is the negotiation of the Geneva
Accord, over three years, by former Israeli and Palestinian
Officials as an unofficial peace agreement, demonstrating that a
negotiated peace is achievable (and that Sharon is wrong when he says
there is no one to negotiate with). Arafat called the accord, "a brave
and courageous initiative...that opens the door to peace." Sharon
condemned the accord. The accord envisages a Palestinian state
encompassing almost all of the occupied territories, with most Israeli
settlements in the West Bank and Gaza being removed. It divides
sovereignty in Jerusalem and
does not allow for a large scale return of Palestinians to Israel.
Meanwhile, the plight of Palestinians
remains serious and is becoming worse. The economy, never good, worsened by
Palestinians not being able to work in Israel, has been further reduced
by Israeli attacks, land seizures and the building of the security
wall. Palestinian life is extremely difficult and there is increasing
malnutrition. According to Chris MacGreal of The Guardian, on October 27, the
construction of the fence, in addition to taking Palestinian land
without compensation, is leaving tens of thousands of Palestinians on
the Israeli side, where their legal status is deteriorating.
Those Palestinians are now required to have special permits simply to
live in their houses and work their land, and their new legal status
of "long-term resident: is tenuous. Indeed, The fence that is
being built now is not intended to separate between Israelis and
Palestinians, so much as between Palestinians and Palestinians. To cut
the Palestinian territory into ribbons. To confine the Palestinians in
isolated pockets. A glaring example is the double wall now being built
around the town of a-Ram, north of Jerusalem. It has 60 thousand
inhabitants, of which 40 thousand have Jerusalem IDs and Israeli
license plates on their cars. But the double wall will cut the town
off, both from Jerusalem and the West Bank.
Only one single way out of this pocket will remain: the infamous
Kalandia checkpoint. Normal life has become impossible, commercial life
is being destroyed, pupils have to get up at 5 am in order to reach
their schools in adjoining neighborhoods on the other side of the wall.
Sick people and pregnant women are on the road for hours before they
reach their hospitals in Jerusalem or Ramallah - if they get there at
all.
Seemingly out of frustration, and/or desperation, Israeli security actions have
increasingly become more harsh. For some months, International
nonviolent activists have been arrested and on increasing occasions
treated harshly by security forces, with several being killed and
injured. In early January, the Israeli
Defense Force announced that soldiers are permitted to shoot at
demonstrators, both Palestinians and Israelis. Even during the weeks
without suicide bombings several Palestinians were killed and others
injured each day by the many Israeli security actions around the
occupied territories,
In an example of one of these, from December 25 to January 6 (following
11 days of intensified daily incursions into the city) the Israeli
Defense Force (IDF) conducted one of the largest operations it
has undertaken in the City of Nablus on the West Bank, keeping the city
under almost continuous curfew with a complete commercial shut down,
allowing only humanitarian services to travel, causing considerable
tension with local inhabitants, leading to shooting with live
ammunition by IDF forces, killing 6 and wounding more than 50
Palestinians. Some houses and historic buildings were destroyed and
others damaged. Some houses were sealed for several days, so that their
inhabitants could not leave. (For more details see the report of the UN
Office of Humanitarian Affairs).
Within the Palestinian Authority,
Arafat remains in a struggle to keep as much power as possible,
that he is largely winning. Meanwhile, members of the Israeli
government now rarely speak of removing him. New Palestinian Prime
Minister Ahmed Qurei, with help from Egypt, has been negotiating with
Hamas and other radical groups to renew the "hudna" cease-fire that his
predecessor, Mahmoud Abbas negotiated. This remains a possibility,
though Hamas resists going beyond ceasing attacks within Israel,
leaving open the possibility of attacks on settlements and security
forces in the Occupied territories. The Ma‚an Network of independent
Palestinian TV stations is airing a 16 part series of talk show,
"Reframing Incitement," focusing on the various understandings that
Israelis and Palestinians have on this controversial issue. Programs
will focus on specific topics such as incitement in schoolbooks, in the
media, and in the context of international law. In the Negev, a new
literacy program in Arabic, Hebrew and English aims to bridge the
educational gap between Bedouin high-school students and their Jewish
peers.
A new constitution for Afghanistan
was agreed to in early January, after much difficult discussion and
compromise at the meeting of the Loya Jirga obtained compromises. The
new constitution calls for a strong President with considerable power
to press legislation, while the parliament holds veto power over key
appointments and administrative rule making.
All people have equal rights (women with men) and at least 25% of the
seats in parliament must be filled by women. A key to obtaining
approval of representatives of the Tajik
and Uzbek minorities
was official recognition of their languages alongside that of the
majority Pashtoons. Presidential elections are tentatively to take
place in June, with parliamentary elections to follow in about six
months.
Agreement on a new constitution is a crucial step in building a
peaceful Afghanistan, though not all delegates were satisfied,
indicative of the substantial ethnic and other tensions that need to be
overcome, as well as considerable work in building nationwide security
and making progress in economic development in order to realize a
stable regime. With a small NATO force
now in charge of security, and with the Afghan army still extremely
small, the Taliban have been resurgent, with an increase of fighting,
in the south of the country over the past months, while three local
leaders ("war lords") in the north, for a time, fought amongst each
other. There are still not enough Afghan and allied forces to insure
security through out Afghanistan, slowing aid and reconstruction, that
would be under funded in any case, though some new monies from other
countries have been promised in recent months.
Thus the stability of Afghanistan is not yet assured, and elections may
not be possible in six months. In this situation the opium-poppy
industry has grown to historic heights, and is financing feuding armies
across the country. As the Carnegie
Endowment for International Peace visiting scholar, Husain Haqqani,
an advisor to two Pakistani prime ministers, points out, Afghanistan
now accounts for 77% of the world's global opium production, enough to
refine into 3,600 tons of heroine, and providing more than half of
Afghanistan's $4.4 billion GDP. The drug
money is a ready source of financing for warlords and potential
terrorists. Haqqani says that a major reason that U.S. efforts to rid
Afghanistan of the Taliban have
not worked is that Pakistan, while professing friendship with the U.S.,
is unwilling to shut down the Taliban's support network. Pakistan still
sees the Islamic movement as potentially useful in its long term goal
of keeping the upper hand in its competition with India. Meanwhile, the
Welfare Association for the
Development of Afghanistan and other groups have been working
with traditional tribal democracy in the meetings of village elders
(maliks) in an attempt to form a basis for Twenty-First Century
democracy for the nation. So far the bringing of current national
issues and simpler modern technologies (e.g. markers and newsprint)
into inclusive local meetings is at the pilot project stage, but the
number of such meetings is increasing. By June, the plan is to have
trained 450 maliks in 9 districts.
Much of Central Asia, which is
rich in gas and oil (particularly around the Caspian Sea) has been
troubled by unstable, corrupt governments, economic backwardness and
has a number of radical Islamic movements. In late December, the International Crises Group voiced a
concern that the current "Public Diplomacy" foreign policy approach
misses the point by focusing too heavily on Islamic issues while
ignoring the political, corruption and economic problems which are
likely to drive many people in the region towards radical Islam as the
only alternative to intolerable conditions.
An important note of hope comes in Georgia, where President Eduard
Shevardnadze, after a decade in power, resigned, after the opposition,
angered that Shevardnadze had "stolen" the recent election, took over
the government in a relatively peaceful mass occupation (a "Velvet
Revolution"). The new, democratically oriented, Georgian leaders now
face enormous challenges in stabilizing the country, that, coming out
of the Soviet empire, has no experience with good governance. They face
what had been a mounting danger of political violence, criminal chaos
and pressures for regional groups to seek secession, amidst competing
geopolitical agendas among its neighbors and more distant powers.
The new leaders will continue to have some help from the Soros Foundation, which supported
their democratic efforts in opposition. The International Crises Group
(ICG) stated on December 3, that it sees the key factors in ensuring a
stable transition to be the ability of the country's interim leaders to
act prudently in compromising with existing elites to maintain
stability and continuity, strengthening the legal framework for new
elections and government reform, and achieving a consensus position
among the Russians, the Europeans and the U.S.
New parliamentary elections are scheduled for March. Russia has
complained that the previous government of Georgia allowed Chechen
rebels to operate on its territory, and expects the new government to
act to prevent that, lest Russia undertake actions against the Chechens in Georgia. In Azerbaijan, in October, thousands of
opposition supporters battled police after international observers
charged vote rigging and fraud had improperly bought about the victory
in the presidential election of the incumbent president's son.
The guerilla war continues to take casualties and make life difficult
in Chechnya, with Amnesty
International reporting that there is credible evidence that Russian security forces have been
involved in considerable abduction, rape, torture and extrajudicial
execution, while Chechen forces have violated human rights, including
hostage taking, attacks on municipal authorities and extrajudicial
executions of Russian prisoners of war.
India and Pakistan have been
increasingly improving their relations, despite the fact that Islamic
groups in the Indian portion of Kashmir
continue to engage in guerilla warfare for independence.
The improvements have now moved from reestablishing air and train
service, and cricket matches, between the two counties to a cease fire
between Indian and Pakistani forces along the Kashmire boarder, in
November, to agreeing to negotiate the Kashmir situation, in January.
The agreement to negotiate came at the South Asian Association for
Regional Cooperation meeting in Islamabad, during which India's Prime
Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee and Pakistan's President General Pervez
Musharraf met in Islamabad for more than an hour, in their first face
to face dialogue since 2001.
Sri Lanka's President Chandrika Kumaratunga took a number steps, in
November, that may have brought an end to seemingly promising
negotiations, led by her political rival, Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe, with the Tamil Tigers
to end three decades of civil war. Fearing that the government would
offer concessions to the Tigers that she finds unacceptable, with the
insurgents demanding that the Tamil areas of northern Sri Lanka be
governed as an autonomous region, she suspended parliament, dismissed
three key ministers, sent troops to secure major facilities in the
capital and declared a state of emergency. The Asia Times reported that
India and the United States then intervened behind the scenes to
achieve an end of the President's coup and to return the President and
Prime Miinister to talking to each other.
In Nepal, Amnesty International reports that
a January cease fire has brought hope for relief for civilians in the
civil war, that it says requires international pressure to insure.
Since the Nepalese government granted the army increased powers in
2001, several thousand people have been killed, mostly those whom the
army believes support the Maoist opposition that controls about 40% of
the country.
Diplomatic efforts led by the Europeans
Union have been a major factor in getting Iran to agree to U.N.
nuclear inspections to insure that that nation is not developing atomic
weapons. In September, however, concern about U.S. unilateralism,
including threats to Iran over its nuclear development, brought India to offer Iran cooperation in
all strategic areas, including defense. Meanwhile, negotiations are
anticipated between reformists and hard liners in Iran, as reformist
members of Parliament have staged a sit in as prelude to a threatened
boycott of elections, if a decision by the Guardian Council that
disqualified more than 3,000 of the 8,200 people who filed as
candidates in the parliamentary election is not revoked.
Virtually all of the reformist candidates were barred, including 80
current members of parliament.
Diplomatic efforts to settle the nuclear crises involving North Korea's
nuclear weapons building and potentially using and selling capacity
continue with occasional, and some times rescheduled, multipower talks
alternately raising and lowering hopes of a settlement. Meanwhile,
severe food shortages continue in North Korea, threatening mass
starvation. Eventually the regime may collapse, which could bring a
massive movement of mal nourished refugees to South Korea and to southern China,
which is already receiving desperate North Koreans, though many are
turned back at the boarder.
Eventually, North Korea may
integrate with South Korea, but the economic burden of bringing the 22
million impoverished North Koreans into the economy and society of
South Korea would be extraordinarily massive, and much more difficult
and costly than the merger of East and West Germany which burdened the
Germany Economy for a decade, and involved other social problems as
well.
Amnesty International (AI) reports that since Indonesia declared martial law in
Aceh, in May, with troops ineffectively trying to counter the
rebellion, government troops have been on a rampage against civilians
with mass arrests, torture, rape, disappearances and extra judicial
executions, AI reports that on May 30, Myanmar (Burma) government
backed gangs armed with iron rods and bats attacked a National League for Democracy Motorcade,
killing several democracy activists, following which NLD leader Aung
San Suu Kyi has been held incommunicado and a more than a hundred NLD
supporters have been missing.
The United Nations Development
Program has praised Vietnam for reducing poverty 40% and moving
from "a food hungry" nation to the world's second largest rice
exporter, since 1980. Vietnam is mostly on track to meet the Millennium
Development Goals to be achieved by 2015, as set forth by the 2000 UN
Millennium summit.
In November, following failed attempts by the British government, supported bythe
Irish government, to obtain a breakthrough between Sinn Fein and the Ulster Unionist Party
(despite the largest, secret, internationally verified, weapons
decommissioning by the IRA to date), Northern Irish voters gave a
majority of the Protestant seats in their parliament to Reverend Ian
Paisley's hard-line Democratic Unionists, who oppose the power-sharing
peace agreement, and IRA connected Sinn Fein the majority of the
catholic seats, making it impossible to restart the Northern Ireland
government. The peace process is now in a dangerous limbo, with the
situation threatened with deteriorating if a breakthrough is not made
in the short to medium run. Meanwhile, there is hope that other efforts
at Protestant-Catholic reconciliation may bring about peace in the
longer term, particularly if the economy can remain good, reducing the
ranks of the unemployed who are the primary source of recruits for
militias.
In October in Vienna, Kosovo Serbs
and Albanians began the first of a series of conferences
launched by the International Contact Group (Brittan, France Germany,
Russia and the U.S.) that it is hoped will lead to a peaceful
settlement of Kosovo's future. The situation is difficult, delicate and
explosive as most Kosovo Albanians and Serbs have very different views
of Kosovo's future. Thus technical issues on which cooperation is
easiest to achieve have been taken up first, including license plates,
environmental concerns and missing persons cases. In Macedonia, a study
by the University of Skopje shows that, after five years, the country's
most popular children's television show, about a group of children of
different ethnic heritages, is beginning to have positive effects in
fostering friendly relations among children of different ethnic groups
that watch the show. For example, an ethnic Macedonian child who watches the
show is twice as likely to invite an ethnic Albanian child home, than
one who does not, and kids who see the program have expressed interest
in learning the languages of other ethnic groups.
After a long period of rethinking and several stages of policy change, Libya has ended its nuclear,
chemical and biological weapons programs, opened itself to
international inspections, which have begun, ratifed the nuclear
nonproliferation treaty, in mid January, and called on other nations in
the region to end their efforts to build weapons of mass destruction. Egypt and Syria responded by
saying that Israel must first give up its weapons of mass destruction,
particularly its nuclear arsenal estimated to contain at least 200
atomic bombs. Libya, which has just reached an amended settlement with France settling the last of the
cases involving its participation in airplane bombings, has needed the
ending of economic sanctions, including the opportunity to refurbish
its oil fields. Pressure for the United States to end the last
international sanctions on Libya has come from three major oil
companies that have been concerned about returning to Libya before
their rights to extract oil expire. Thus international economic
sanctions and pressures have been a major factor in bringing about a
change in Libyan policy.
Ian Williams and Stephen Zunes wrote in September in Foreign Policy in Focus (online at
www.fpif.org), "After much wrangling from the French, the UN Security
Council unanimously passed resolution 1495 right on the July 31st
deadline for the rollover of the MINURSO peacekeeping operation in
Western Sahara. In the best diplomatic tradition, the resolution
affirmed the commitment to provide for the self-determination of the
people of Western Sahara, even
while it seriously compromised on it by supporting a peace plan that
would allow the Moroccan settlers in the territory to vote on
independence in five years. As with Israeli settlers on the West Bank,
these Moroccan colonists are there in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which
prohibits countries from transferring their civilian population onto
territories seized by military force".
In Morocco, in October, a twenty year struggle for women's rights
brought the passage of a law that gives women equal status with men,
shared family rights and the right to initiate divorce, greatly limits
polygamy and no longer requires women to get permission of their father
or a brother before marrying.
The International Crisis Group has published its annual assessment of
the world's crises, in late December. Reported as deteriorating are: Central Africa, Ivory Coast, Haiti,
Pakistan, Serbia and Zimbabwe. Estimated as improving: Burundi, Comoros Islands, Ethiopia,
Guatemala, Kashmir and Libya. Amongst those seen as at
essentially the same state of conflict are Afghanistan and Iraq and a host of
others. Nations listed as in danger of increased conflict include Georgia, Haiti, and Sudan (which is
attempting to negotiate a peace process).
Amnesty International, near the end of last year, reported the
following nations as being involved in the worlds major human rights
crises:
The
Russian Federation/Chechenya with Russian security forces
committing atrocities against Chechen civilians, and with tens of
thousands of Chechens displaced and not granted asylum outside of
Chechnya.
North
Korea with repression of fundamental rights, ill treatment in
prison camps, religious repression, food shortages and denial of human
rights monitoring; Nepal with government killings, "disappearances,"
torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, and rebel killings, hostage
taking and torture;
Philippines
with unlawful killings, "disappearances" of opposition politicians,
activists and journalists, torture and ill treatment of prisoners
including sexual assault and military crackdown on political dissent;
Indonesia
with extra-judicial executions, "disappearances," torture
and unlawful arrests, lack of resolution of crimes against humanity in East Timor (now Timor-Leste),
prisoners of conscience, and human rights defenders killed, tortured
and detained;
Guatemala
with human rights defenders and activists targeted for
death threats, rape, torture and extra-judicial executions, and
lynchings by former civil patrolers; Columbia with unlawful killings,
"disappearances," forced internal displacement, kidnappings, and
extreme political violence by the government and armed groups;
Venezuela
with political violence, police killings, attacks on
journalists and opposition supporters, excessive force to disperse
protesters, torture and ill treatment and refugees forced to flee
violence;
Israel/Occupied
Territories with unlawful killings and targeted assassinations
by Israeli security forces, killings of Israeli civilians by Arab
suicide bombers, mass arrests without charge or trial, war crimes
including using Palestinians as human
shields in military operations, obstruction of medical
assistance and targeting of medical personnel, wanton destruction of
property and inhuman treatment of civilians; (Iraq under Saddam),
Afghanistan (past and
present) with arbitrary detentions and poor prison conditions,
mass graves discovered, harassment and violence against women, ethnic
violence and retribution killings, thousands of internally displaced
refugees forced home where there is not a sustainable environment;
Algeria with hundreds
killed by armed groups, civilians killed in antigovernment protests,
torture and secret detention, human rights defenders harassed, killings
and "disappearances" by government forces;
Cote d'Ivoire; Burundi
with extra-judicial executions, unlawful killings by rebels,
destruction of property and looting, arbitrary arrests, torture and
"disappearances," prolonged detention without trial, and hundreds of
thousands of people displaced or forced to flee;
Democratic Republic of Congo
with extra-judicial executions, widespread torture, secret detentions,
forcible recruitment of child soldiers,
and hundreds of thousands of refugees and internally displaced persons;
and
Liberia (previous regime
and continuing conflict) large numbers of civilians killed and
tortured, forcible recruitment of child soldiers, hundreds of thousands
of refugees and internally displaced people, increased repression of
political opponents, journalists and human rights activists.
For more up to date and other information go to: www.amnestyusa,org.
Survival International the worldwide
organization supporting tribal peoples, marked August 9, UN Day
for Indigenous People, by naming the three tribes currently facing the
greatest danger to their survival:
The AYoreo-totobiegodode
of western Paraguay are the last uncontacted Indians south of the
Amazon basin. Over the last century, most of their land has been
taken by loggers and cattle ranchers. Illegal incursions onto their
land are increasing, and the Indians' last refuge is being squeezed
from all sides. Survival International reported, in late July, that,
Illegal incursions into the territory of uncontacted
Ayoreo-Totobiegosode Indians in Paraguay
are continuing. Landowners are erecting fences along
tracks bulldozed illegally into the forest, in the first step to
clearing the forest and introducing cattle. Bulldozers illegally
invaded the land of the Ayoreo-Totobiegosode tribe of the Chaco region at the end of
September.
The Gana and Gwi 'Bushmen' and their
neighbors the Bakgalagadi were evicted from their ancestral land in the
Central Kalahari Game Reserve in Botswana in 2002. The
government claims this is to 'develop' them - but since the evictions,
their land has been carved up for diamond exploration by companies
including De Beers and BHP Billiton.
Meanwhile, the Bushmen are forced to live in grim government camps
where their way of life is falling apart, and they are desperate to
return home. In August, A motion was signed by 32 British MPs, calling
on Parliament to support the Bushmen's right to their ancestral land in
the Central Kalahari Game Reserve.
The Jarawa tribe, who number only
250-300 and live in the rainforests of the Andaman Islands in the
Indian Ocean, hunting with bows and arrows, have resisted
contact with settlers from mainland India for 150 years. Now, they are
at risk of exploitation, and diseases to which they have no immunity,
due to a road bulldozed through their land. An unknown number have
already died in a measles epidemic.
Survival's director Stephen Corry said, 'The Ayoreo-Totobiegosode, the
Bushmen and the Jarawa live in totally contrasting environments across
three continents, yet the racism and the threats they face are
startlingly similar. Unless these tribes are allowed to live on their
own land in peace, they will not survive.' For more information contact
Miriam Ross: (+44) (0)20 7687 8734, email
mr@survival-international.org, http://www.survival-international.org.
The European Parliament adopted
strong new resolutions supporting indigenous peoples' rights in Africa, in mid-September. The
parliament announced it 'strongly' supports the demands of the Pygmies, 'Bushmen' ('Basarwa') and
others to be recognized as indigenous peoples. Indigenous and tribal
peoples' right to communal ownership of their land is guaranteed under
international law, but many African countries fail to recognize this.
The parliament also resolved that its agreements must contain 'specific
clauses and mechanisms to assess respect for and the protection of the
fundamental rights of indigenous peoples, who are all too often the
victims of extremely serious and systematic violations'. Meanwhile, a
member of the European Parliament, Richard Howitt, has asked that
"European Union funding of the Wildlife Conservation and Management
Programme in Botswana should be made dependent on the proper
recognition of Bushman land rights in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve
and on Bushmen being allowed to return freely to their land within the
Central Kalahari Game Reserve."
In Botswana, police have been
physically preventing Gana and Gwi
'Bushmen' and Bakgalagadi returning to their homes or visiting
relatives in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve, their ancestral land.
Botswana's government has driven almost all the Bushmen out of the
reserve, which is now almost entirely covered in diamond exploration concessions.
Survival International, which has been building international support
for the Bushman, has recently been labeled a 'terrorist' organization
by a senior figure in both Debswana,
De Beers's Botswana diamond mining subsidiary, and the
government.
SHRO-Cairo reported, in April, that the Sudan Government's Arab Militia had
assassinated Reverend Saleh Dakoro, the Shaikh of the Massaleit, one of
the peoples of DarFur displaced by the government from their
traditional lands.
On October 14, the Constitutional
Court of South Africa ruled that an indigenous people, the
Richtersveld people who live in Northern Cape Province, had both
communal land ownership and mineral rights over their territory. Laws
which tried to dispossess them were 'racial discrimination'. The
decision is that indigenous people who own land under their own,
unwritten, law have the right to have this upheld in spite of other
legal systems which are subsequently imposed by the state. This has
important implications for countries like Botswana, which also operate under
the same 'Roman-Dutch' legal system,
and where indigenous 'Bushmen' tribes - long discriminated against by
the dominant Tswana tribes -
are now being forcibly evicted from their reserve in the central
Kalahari to make way for diamond mining in the future.
In March, the San Council, the elected representatives of the San Peoples of South Africa, and the
South African Government's Council for Scientific and Industrial
Research, jointly announced their agreement to share the benefits of
what could be a very lucrative diet pill, developed in large part from
traditional San knowledge of plants and their uses.
The Tanzanian government
announced in august that it will remove more than 200 Maasai families from the Ngorongoro
Crater, one of the country's most profitable tourist sites. The Maasai
fear this is just the beginning of a plan to evict all of them who live
in the region of the Crater. Survival International is backing their
protests.
In Cameroon, after years of
pressure from the Mbororo and Survival International supporters, an
official commission has started to investigate charges that a prominent
politician and rancher has been persecuting the Mbororo cattle herders
of northwest Cameroon.
A
power sharing agreement was signed, in April, to end conflict among
warring factions in the Democratic
Republic of Congo, but on the following day nearly 1,000
civilians, mostly Hemas, were
massacred in the Ituri region by a largely Lendu force backed by
Ugandan soldiers, while thousands of troops in the province continued
to skirmish. UN secretary General Kofi Annan called for international
peace keepers to be sent to end the violence. In Burundi, in October, following an
agreement between the government and the largest rebel group to end the
10 year civil war, some 3000 African Union troops from South Africa,
Mozambique and Ethiopia arrived in the capital to expand a peace
process to that one rebel group had not yet joined and another was
violating.
For a time, the arrival of French peacekeeping
forces in the Ivory
Coast brought about a tense calm, but by December that faded as
government supporters opposing its settlement with opposition groups
begin challenging French troops over their perceived support for
anti-government rebels. The BBC reports that President Laurent Gbagbo
has come under pressure from his own army to confront the rebels, and
the French. The International Crisis Group warns that a renewal of
fighting could overwhelm the entire region, kindling new violence in
neighboring Liberia and ether countries.
In Sudan, progress has been
made in negotiating a peace, as in Kenya, in early January Sudan's
government and the rebel Sudan People's Liberation Army signed an
agreement on to share oil revenues equally. Funds derived from other
sources are also to be equally divided. With this difficult issue
resolved, it is hoped that other issues can be more easily settled. It
has been agreed that the South od Sudan will function as an autonomous
region. However, who is to control three disputed areas - the Nuba
Mountains, the southern Blue Nile and the Abyei region - remain a
serious bone of contention between the factions.
Nigeria continues to be plagued by
conflict, in some instances over oil revenues, that do not come to the
people of oil producing and transporting areas, and also between ethnic
and religious groups. In an outbreak of Muslim-Christian strife in Yobe
state, at the beginning of this year, members of a militant Islamic
student group, reportedly seeking their own state or autonomous
government, fought police for five days in three towns in the northern
region, disrupting markets and community life.
The Fifth Ministerial Meeting of the World
Trade Organization, September 10-14, in Cancun, Mexico, and the
Eighth Ministerial Meeting of the Free Trade Area of the Americas
November 20-21, in Miami, demonstrated that the opposition to
neoliberal economic globalization is increasing grassroots efforts in
mobilizing. As a result, the ministerial meeting to negotiate a Free
Trade Area of the Americas in Miami was only able to produce a heavily
diluted agreement revealing that there no longer is a free trade
consensus in the Americas. Kevin P. Gallagher, writing November 14 in
Citizen Action in the Americas (http://www.americaspolicy.org/),
comments: "If the U.S. wants to see progress on trade, they will have
to listen to the concerns of its southern neighbors".
In southern Mexico, the
government is beginning to move on massive development projects in
hydro electric power, oil exploration, extraction and pipe line
building, super highway construction and biotechnology development
under Plan Panama (PPP) that will disrupt indigenous communities and
force massive migration. The Zapatistas say that they will resist the
relocation efforts that would be undertaken by the army.
Meanwhile the Council of Traditional
Indigenous Midwives and Healers has been leading a campaign
against the biotechnology projects, that it sees as biopiracy,
attaining a victory with the cancelling of one of the planned projects
of the U.S. International Cooperative Biodiversity Group to collect
plant samples with very low payments to the Mexican government and no
benefit to the indigenous population. Raramuri (Tarahumara)
Indians in the Mountains of Northern Mexico have long been involved in
a conflict to stop clear cut logging (as opposed to sustainable
selective cutting) in their area. For a number of years, beginning in
the mid1980's, a number of the Raramuri anti logging activists were
murdered. Earlier this year, several of them were arrested on what they
claim are trumped up charges, after a successful road blockade brought
an end to logging by a non-Indian community.
Virginia Bouvier, writing an analysis for Program Policy Briefs in the
Inter-Hemispheric Resource Center's America's Program, concludes that
the U.S. anti-terrorism and anti drug
campaigns in Colombia have intensified the nature of the
conflict, while blurring the lines amongst a war against drugs, the war
against terror and Colombia's
own complex insurgency (Virginia Bouvier, IRC, September 29, 2003,
www.irc-online.org.). Meanwhile, the war continues with some noteworthy
events transpiring. In October, Columbian President Alvaro Uribe's 15
point referendum was voted down by voters, weakening the political
position of the President who had taken a hard line on defeating the
guerillas militarily. Among the defeated measures were propositions
that would have: made it possible for a President to have a second
term, given the military judicial powers, and alternative penalties for
right wing paramilitaries. In November, 855 members of the Cacique Nutibara bloc of right wing
paramilitary groups disarmed. The government called this a step toward
peace while critics complained that it gave amnesty to killers,
kidnappers and drug dealers.
A
massive popular mobilization of indigenous and other people in Bolivia, blocking all highways into
the capital city and besieging the presidential palace, forced the
resignation of the President, Gonzalo Sanchez de Lozada, in mid
October, when the President lost key political support while the
security apparatus was unwilling to stage a massive and bloody
crackdown a-la Pinochet in Chile. The mobilization arose out of a
non-violent movement, primarily involving Aymara peasants, an indigenous
group making up about a quarter of Bolivia's population, based in El
Alto, an Aymara city of some 700,000, but now extending, to the
hillside neighborhoods of Upper Miraflores, Munaypata, Villa Victoria,
Villa del Carmen, Villa Fatima and the Cemetery of La Paz.
The movement's demands include the formation of a new Constituent
Assembly, a repeal of the privatization and foreign investment laws,
and a cessation of the government's plan for a $5.2 billion dollar
natural gas pipeline project, controlled by a consortium of
multinational energy companies to export Bolivia's natural gas to the United States,
via Chile. The President had agreed to put the export plan up
for a national referendum, but this was not enough to satisfy those
demanding his resignation. The movement does not oppose gas exports by
Bolivia, only the terms under which it was to be undertaken in the
government's plan, which would have benefited only the elite, and not
average Bolivians. How Bolivia's huge reserves of gas are to be
exploited, and who the benefits will accrue to, are heated political
issues in Bolivia. Previous export cycles of non-renewable commodity
exports of silver through the 19th century, guano and rubber later that
century and tin in the 20th century have never laid the basis for a
prosperous, productive and just society.
On the contrary, Bolivia is
one of the least prosperous and most unjust societies in Latin America.
The question Bolivians are rightly asking is, 'how will this next round
of non-renewable commodity exports be turned into real development?'
The movement succeeded in ousting the President, despite terrible
repression. There was a massacre in late September, and dozens more
were killed by police and security forces during the siege of La Paz. The current conflict is a
continuation of a mass mobilization that occurred in January-February
of 2003. At that time, a movement of campesinos demanded the
suspension of coca eradication, the repudiation of the Free Trade Area
of the Americas, and re-nationalization and an end to privatization.
The security apparatus nearly divided, but in the end remained with the
government and repressed the movement, with over 20 killed and many
more injured.
The elections of June 2002 set Bolivia on the road to the current
crisis as well. In those elections, a new party, the Movimiento Al Socialismo (MAS) led
by Evo Morales, a representative of the coca growers of the Chapare
region, came very close to winning the election. MAS is a coalition of
social movements, including peasants and worker's unions, with a strong
stance against privatizations and corporate globalization. The
Vice President, Carlos Mesa, a former journalist, not previously a
politician, put on the ticket to make de Lozada's candidacy more
viable, and who distanced himself from the President during the siege,
has become the new president, saying that he would serve as a
nonpartisan caretaker until early elections can be held. More
information is available from ZNet's
Bolivia Watch: http://www.zmag.org. Other sources include:
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com, http://www.essential.org,
http://www.fpif.org, and http://www.consortiumnews.com.
In Guatemala last fall,
General Efrain Rios Montt, who seized power in 1982 and whose brutal
policies caused about almost 20,000 deaths in the next year and a half,
intimidated his way into being a major candidate for President. In July
he called for a demonstration in support of his candidacy just before
the Constitutional Court was to decide on his eligibility. About 5,000
masked supporters armed with machetes and clubs invaded the capital,
shut down the U.S. embassy, terrorized workers at several human rights
organizations and chased journalists (one of whom was beaten, while a
second died of a heart attack) while neither the police or the army
intervened. The court then stated that the constitutional ban on those
who had seized power serving as President was not retroactive, and thus
did not apply to Montt. However, Montt did not come close to winning
the election, perhaps a sign that there are significant forces for a
more socially, economically and politically just and representatively
governed society in Guatemala that may reverse the recent slide back
toward increasing corruption, domination by the wealthy, repression and
conflict.
Exemplifying this movement, the Political
Association of Maya Women (Moloj), in Guatemala, with assistance
from the Soros Foundation, has developed an education program to
empower and encourage indigenous people to participate effectively in
the political process. A huge environmental problem has been created on
Guatemala's Pacific coast with the rise of shrimp farming. Properly
undertaken, shrimp aquaculture can increase marine food
production with only small damage to the environment. As has most often
been the case elsewhere, however, shrimp
farming in Guatemala has been seriously polluting the surrounding waters,
after 12 years reducing fish catches by more than 80%. Moreover, after
five or ten years of operation, most shrimp farms are destroyed by
their own pollution.
Haiti has been becoming a more and
more violent place as the government, that previously provided hope for
democracy and equitable, development has become increasingly corrupt
and repressive. As indicated above, Amnesty International has released
a stream of reports complaining of government tolerance of police
brutality and torture. Transparency
International, tracking government corruption, ranks Haiti as
one of the most corrupt nations. Meanwhile. Haiti has continued to fall
on the U.N. Human Development Index, dropping to 150th among 175
countries. As poverty rises, life expectancy falls, and only 60% of all
children attend school.
In a speech to the General Assembly in September, UN Secretary General
Kofi Annan criticized unilateralism and
asked the UN to open a discussion about changing the rules of
international military intervention to accommodate the need for early,
rapid action against emerging threats.
The United Nations Conference on
Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Trade and Development Report 2003,
in October, found unequivocally that neoliberal economic policies of
globalization, leaving development to the market (with minimal
government services and regulation) for two decades has left subSaharan Africa in an economic
wasteland, while declining shares of manufacturing output and
employment ("deindustrialization") have accompanied rapid
liberalization in many Latin American nations. Under neoliberal
economic policies, "enclaves" of industrialization linked to
international production chains have dotted this landscape, without in
most cases translating into more broad-based investment, value added
and productivity growth. The study reports an urgent need for global
economic institutions and governments rethink policies and return to
carefully designed, vigorous government intervention to provide
necessary economic stimulus and guidance, and to create and preserve an
appropriate climate for development.
The report concluded that the policies pursued to eliminate inflation
and downsize the public sector have often undermined growth and
hampered technological progress. As a result, "the current economic
landscape in the developing world has an uncanny resemblance to
conditions prevailing in the early 1980s", when many countries slipped
into deep crisis. The target level of investment for catch-up growth -
estimated by the Report to be in the range of 20-to-25% of GDP - has
eluded most countries undergoing rapid market reforms.
By contrast, active state participation in the economy in East Asia after the debt crisis
produced a strong investment performance, growing manufacturing value
added and employment and a rising share of manufacturing exports, with
productivity and technology gaps with leading industrial countries
rapidly closing. Elsewhere, the Report finds a less encouraging record:
Industrial progress has halted in much of the developing world: only
eight of 26 selected countries succeeded in raising the share of
manufacturing value added in GDP between 1980 and the 1990s, together
with a rising share of investment. In economies with lagging
industrialization and a declining share of investment, the share of
manufactures in total exports has also been stagnant or falling, while
exchange rate depreciation and wage restraint have been the basis for
bolstering trade performance. The production structure in much of Latin
America and Africa has seen a notable shift away from sectors with the
greatest potential for productivity growth towards those producing and
processing raw materials.
Where trade and investment have risen in the context of international
production networks, the tendency has been for an apparent increase in
the technology content of exports without a similar increase in
domestic value added. A study released in January found that, when
taken as a group, all of the less-developed countries that depend on
exporting oil, have seen the living standards of their populations
drop--and drop dramatically. In December, the United States signed a regional free
trade pact with El Salvador,
Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua.
The UN Food and Agriculture
Organization reported in late November that number of hungry
people, and the extent of food insecurity, worldwide has increased
markedly since the mid 1990's, rising at an average rate of 4.5 million
additional people short of food a year from 1995 to 2000, leaving more
than 840 million people, or more than 14% of the world population,
malnourished. FAO stated that the findings indicate that it will be
impossible to meet the goal, set in 1996, of reducing world hunger in half by 2016.
FAO called on rich countries to invest in agricultural productivity,
conservation of natural resources and expansion of access to global
markets for farmers in the developing world. The report called the
situation a lack of will rather than a shortage of available food. The
most serious rise in hunger was reported to be in sub-Saharan Africa as a result of
war, drought, AIDS and trade barriers. In September, some of the worlds
poorest nations called on the more well to do nations to assist their
development through fairer trade, and in increase in the UN role in
achieving peace, security and world economic development.
In September, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan warned that the world
wide effort against AIDS is
woefully inadequate, with too little being done for the 40 million
effected while the epidemic spreads. UNAIDS
reported in late November that the number of deaths
resulting from AIDS around the globe continues to increase and would
reach 3 million for 2003 with an additional 5 million projected as
having acquired the HIV virus during the year, bringing the number of
people living with it to from 34 to 36 million. An estimated 26 million
people are infected by HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, while new waves of
the disease are occurring in China, Indonesia and Russia because of
drug use and unsafe sex. Several counties have made progress in
combating the spread of the disease including Uganda.
The United Nations Fund for Women
has reported in November that efforts to end violence against women
around the planet have run into stiffening resistance, in many cases,
and require that the effort be given the highest priority.
The World Conservation Union 2003 Red
List, made public in November, now includes 12,259 plants and
animals facing extinction,
mostly from human action. It is estimated that the current rate of
extinction is 1,000-10,000 times higher than it would be under
completely natural conditions.
Research findings published in Nature,
in January, indicate that global warming is threatening to make
hundreds species of plants and animals extinct by 2050 if the
production of green house gases that are accelerating it is not
significantly reduced, A UNEP study made public in January found that
the impact of pumping unlimited quantities of carbon into the
atmosphere is not only heating up the world's atmosphere, it is also
freezing some areas and triggering drought and flooding in others. A
November meeting of the National Science Project SEARCH (Study of
Environmental Artic Change) indicated that the considerable heating up
of the arctic in the last ten years is related to, and possibly caused,
by the development of a polar vortex, or massive maelstrom of air,
which may be the result of global warming. A study by Cambridge
University scientists, released in November, indicates that warmer
ocean currents are melting Antarctica's
Larsen Ice Shelf from below, which may be the cause of two of
its section collapsing over the past nine years, and may indicate
future collapse.
There are indications that Russia may not support the Koyoto agreement to reduce green
house gas emissions that are a major cause of global warming. With the
U.S. already failing to support the treaty, Russia's not doing so would
likely kill it.
In late October, the Climate
Stewardship Act, in the first vote ever held in the Senate on
real reductions in the emissions that cause global warming, did not
pass, but as 43 Senators supported the measure, some environmentalists
believe that this is a sign of hope for stronger action on global
warming in the not too distant future. China's
huge thee gorges dam project is now complete and operating. It remains
to be seen what the environmental impact will actually be, that
environmentalists believe will be quite negative. Deforestation in the Amazon increased 40% in 2003 over
the previous year.
Economists at the International
Monetary Fund warned, in January, that the Untied States is
increasing its foreign debt at such a record pace that the stability of
the global economy is threatened. The report stated that the huge
budget deficit poses a significant risk to the world as well as the
U.S. U.S. financial obligations abroad could become equal to 40% of its
total economy in a few years. The extremely high rate of US borrowing
would raise interest rates world wide, reducing global and U.S.
investment and output. An August report by the Congressional Budget
Office predicts that if current policies continue, the annual federal
government deficit outside of social security is likely to reach $1.1
trillion by 2013.
While the overall crime rate was the same in the U.S. in 2002 and 2001,
violent crime was down .9%, but homicide was up 1% according to the FBI. Meanwhile, following a spike in
2001, hate crimes dropped 25%
in 2002 to 7,462, below the 8063 for 2000. Hate crimes against Arabs and Muslims dropped by 59%,
but Arab and Muslim advocates say these people still are attacked
disproportionately.
For the fourth time in six years, Oprah
Winfrey, whose talk shows are among the most positively and
problem solving oriented, was chosen as the most popular TV personality
in the U.S. for 2002 in a Harris Poll.
According to Human Rights Watch
Executive Director Kenneth Roth, workers rights to form a union are not fully a reality in
the U.S. "Many workers...are
spied on, harassed, pressured, threatened, suspended, fired, deported
or otherwise victimized in reprisal for their exercise of the right" to
choose a union. "Loophole-ridden laws, paralyzing delays and feeble
enforcement have led to a culture of impunity in many areas of U.S.
labor law and practice. Legal obstacles tilt the playing field so
steeply against workers' freedom of association that the United States
is in violation of international human rights standards for workers."
Independent research indicates that that 40 million U.S. non-union
employees want union representation who do not have it.
Top of Page
These articles and opinions of
the authors do not constitute the endorsement of Nonviolent Change nor
its publisher, Organization Development Institute, or any of its staff,
nor of CirclePoint which is housing the Nonviolent Change Journal.
©2002.2003, 2004. All rights reserve. The Nonviolent
Change
Journal is published by the Research/Action Team on Nonviolent
Large Systems Change - an interorganizational and international project
of The Organization Development Institute.
Permissions: Reposting and reprints are encouraged, as long as
proper source acknowledgement is given. As a courtesy, please let us
know that you are reprinting or electronically reposting. It helps
us know of the interest level. Thank you.
|